Thursday, July 21, 2016

United We Fall


Published June 15, 2016 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette
 

            A couple of years ago I wrote a column called “Divided We Stand,” focused on Lindsay and the outside media’s criticism of the city council for having differences of opinion that kept it from “moving forward.”  I argued then that moving forward without considering, much less resolving those differences would not be an advance in civic government, but rather yet another example of the community’s old-time insiders overlooking and overriding the legitimate concerns of the community’s newcomers.

 

            I’d like to make a similar argument now at the national level and the cry for “unity” coming from leaders of both political parties.  Astounded by the popular support for “insurgent” candidates on each side, the standard-bearers of both parties have called for unity at moments when it seemed they might reign in the dissidents on the fringe and regain control.  They were wrong.

 

            Republican voters gave their leaders the finger and plopped Trump in their lap.  The result?  Now calls for party unity would mean abandoning hope for consistent expression of conservative values, not to mention civil discourse.  We don’t hear those calls quite so much now as Trump’s loose cannon approach to campaigning, with its blatant irreverence for the legitimate concerns of every group except workingclass white males, creates canyons between himself and Republican standards of decency.

 

            Voters with concerns not so different than Trump supporters’ brought Bernie Sanders neck and neck with Hillary Clinton despite the early naysayers, who then played the unity card once he rounded the last bend hard on her flank and made her jockeys bring out the whip.  The working people of all ethnicities and genders found themselves held up in his campaign, their concerns honored both in his rhetoric and his solutions.  To “unify” the party before the presumptive nominee had made commitments to those concerns would have been an act of violence comparable to what happened in the Republican party, even though reverse.

 

            I was terribly impressed last week by the 5-minute speech Bernie Sanders made in front of the White House after conferring with President Obama.  (You can watch it on YouTube or I can send you the transcription.)  Rather than concede defeat in order to “unify” the party, Sanders said “We will continue doing everything that we can to oppose the current drift toward an oligarchic society where a handful of billionaires exercise enormous power over our economic, political, and media life.”  The media missed that part, by and large, emphasizing his vow “to do everything in my power – and I will work as hard as I can – to make sure Donald Trump does not become President of the United States,” which is an extension of the first statement in my mind.

 

            Sanders put his finger on the problem of unity for the Republicans:  that it will divide them from the vast percentage of American voters and American values.  “Donald Trump would clearly, to my mind and I think the minds of the majority of Americans, be a disaster as President of the United States.  It is unbelievable to me, and I say this in all sincerity, that the Republican Party would have as a candidate for President, who in the year 2016, makes bigotry and discrimination the cornerstone of his campaign.  In my view, the American people will not vote for or tolerate a candidate who insults Mexicans and Latinos, who insults Muslims, who insults African-Americans and women.”

 

            I truly appreciate the way the Democrats are handling the Sanders campaign, even if it is driven by the need to garner the power of his supporters.  This is a perfect example of what our votes mean:  they count, especially when they express a significant proportion of the needs and concerns of people in this country.  May we stand strongly divided until real change is conceived, lest we fall from grace under the pretense of unity.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is an agrarian activist who writes.  You can send her your campaign thoughts c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

No comments:

Post a Comment