Wednesday, May 9, 2018

We Need to Talk

Published May 9, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     The phrase “We need to talk” can sound menacing when it comes from a boss or a mate, implying the need for some change the hearer may not want. And it might sound menacing to you when I say it regarding immigration issues.  These issues are so longstanding here in the Valley that we think our lives depend on them.  They’re part of the status quo, and that’s what I think we need to talk about.
           
     Monday morning’s Fresno Bee carried yet another front-page story about the trials of people facing deportation who were brought here as children through no fault of their own.  I’m going to call them “importees” from now on, for the sense of involuntariness is what moves us to care, and it should.
           
     This man, Vanna In, considered Cambodian but born in Viet Nam in the mid-1970’s when our war on that country was just ending, leaving rice paddies, roads, villages and towns in ruins, has become a minister to gang members, having been one himself.  He’s not just a productive member of society, he’s a healer of one of this society’s wounds.  But his early childhood education, so to speak, leaves him extremely vulnerable in this tragic political moment, when Congress is too hamstrung to act.  He faces deportation to Cambodia, where he has never lived.
           
     The article, written by Carmen George, who has been bringing us compelling pieces of beauty from our region for several years now, tells how we might help this singular man.  Rev. Vanna In has petitioned Gov. Jerry Brown for a pardon, which could lead to citizenship if granted.  A petition in support of that request is available at www.change.org, and has gathered over 7,000 signatures already.
           
     We need to do more, however, than help people one at a time.  President Trump’s machete-like action cutting off the DACA program, which provided a measure of stability to some of these importees, was a rash challenge to Congress, a wielding of the power of the pen to provoke legislative action toward resolving our unresolved immigration issues.  But Congress cannot resolve them while we, the people, are so unresolved ourselves.
           
     There are people in this country, powerful people, who benefit economically from the availability of undocumented (“illegal”) immigrants.  Their political influence will make it difficult to find a national legislative solution.  Meanwhile, the economic costs are borne by the immigrants themselves and by the communities in which they live.  Rev. Vanna In’s story, luckily, shows us the benefits we also receive at the community level.
           
     Perhaps this story and others will help us start the conversations we need to be having at the local level about immigration:  about who qualifies as “American” and how we gain that status, the pathways to citizenship.  About what we do, as neighbors and friends, when ICE comes to the door of the house down the street, supposedly to “fix” the problem of illegal immigration, but ripping apart families, churches, neighborhoods, and communities instead.
           
     We need to talk, and we need to talk now, before ICE comes.  Let’s find a way to do it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trudy Wischemann is the granddaughter of immigrants before there were laws to prevent them from entering.  You can send her your immigrant origins c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

 

 

 

 

Cure & Correct

Published May 2, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     Well, folks, it looks like we’re going to have a roundabout at Hermosa and Westwood, no matter what.  No matter that 800+ people signed a petition against it back in January, no matter that a study of what might be done at Lincoln School to reduce traffic congestion has not yet been completed.  No matter that anyone in town who hears about the proposal says “What? Not again!” 
           
     At the last city council meeting April 24th, I filed a complaint called a “cure and correct” notice about the public hearing April 10th when the project was approved.  The public hearing had not been identified as such on the council agenda, which was simply noted as a “site plan review.”  For those with long years of experience fighting development projects and surreptitious planning departments, that might have been a red flag.  But for members of the general public, the word “review” sounds like just another discussion.
           
     In my complaint I claimed there had not been proper public notice.  Technically I was mistaken.  I missed the notice published March 24th in the Porterville Recorder, which I don’t subscribe to or read, and I missed the copy of that legal notice in the agenda packet as well.  The city met the minimum legal requirement of notice, but whether or not the spirit of the law has been met is another matter.
           
     At the April 10th meeting we didn’t get a public hearing, we got a kangaroo court.  The city manager did not offer an apology or explanation of why the item hadn’t been identified as a public hearing on the agenda.  He simply jumped up from his chair, declared that it was a public hearing, took over the discussion of the site plan review from Brian Spaunhurst, the assistant city planner who was scheduled to present it, and then raced through the discussion like it was a done deal.  And when it was followed by no discussion from the council whatsoever, it clearly was.
           
     During the public hearing, where I was the only one present to speak either for or against the project, I pointed out that no other member of the public was there.  Not one of the people who signed the petition, not one of the property owners who will be impacted, not one of the parents of Lincoln School students who are concerned about how their children will be escorted safely through the crosswalks of a traffic device intended to keep cars and trucks from having to stop.  Not one.  When I called one of the organizers to find out why no one showed, she said no, she hadn’t seen the notice, either, but she hadn’t been able to attend more meetings, and figured they were going to do what they wanted anyway.  And of course, she was right.
           
     There’s a lack of integrity in the planning process in Lindsay.  If we had a planning commission like every other little town in this region, there would be more time for public input and education about what they’re trying to build here with public funds.  But without that forum, it’s even more important that the public planning process is done right, in the spirit as well as the letter of the law mandating that process.   Let us begin with a reconsideration of the Hermosa/Westwood roundabout.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trudy Wischemann is a former student of environmental planning who lives appalled in Lindsay.  You can send her your ideas for improvement c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.