Monday, June 6, 2016

The Incontinent Divide

Published May 25, 2016 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     In Saturday’s Fresno Bee, Andrew Fiala, Director of the Ethics Center at Fresno State, wrote a whole-hearted column defending the place of enlightenment in our nation’s constitution and educational system.  Although I have worked hard to become a reputable and responsible product of that system, his column left me feeling torn, like someone standing with the Great Continental Divide running between each foot.  
           
     I admire and like Dr. Fiala:  he came to speak at Lindsay’s Cultural Arts Center last fall about the cultural roots of violence, and his research appeared to me to be useful and important.  In writing a regular column for the Bee, Fiala is spreading that usefulness beyond the university’s bounds, much like what I try to do with my column in this paper.  I see him as an ally. 
           
     But Saturday’s piece traced a fault line that runs through this country’s mentality between the so-called enlightened and the so-called unenlightened, a strike-slip fault like the San Andreas where each side inexorably moves in the opposite direction of the other, tearing up the zone between them.  In defining and defending “enlightenment,” Fiala was trying to describe the sometimes invisible place of liberal values in this otherwise conservative region.  But knowledge, that hoped-for product of enlightenment thinking, does not always lead down a liberal path, or even a progressive one.
           
     Over the last 100 years some of the world’s greatest political tyrants have been highly educated (Cambodia’s Pol Pot, for example.)  Universities have produced some of the hardest-line conservatives the world has known, and not just in the area of national defense.  Decades of promulgation of the Green Revolution and the structure of agribusiness around the world have destroyed native cultures and ecologies whose knowledge bases and ways of living were sustainable.  They were replaced by what is not sustainable at great cost to people, places and the future of the world.  The hope I once had for enlightenment thinking has been replaced by a giant suspicion of academics not unlike that of the Trump followers.
           
    “Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppression will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day,” Fiala quoted Thomas Jefferson.  I love to quote Jefferson and often do, despite being chastised by the politically-correct foes of racism who apparently remind Fiala as well as myself of Jefferson’s ownership of slaves.  But enlightenment of people does not eliminate the source of tyranny and oppression, which as often comes from someone who considers himself (or herself) more enlightened than the people referred to above.  It might prepare them better to resist or eventually conquer tyrants and oppressors, but it certainly does not erase those evil spirits from our days.
           
     Four decades ago, when I was a 26-year-old student new to UC Berkeley (notably a land grant college,) I was escorted by an elderly, retired economics professor to the north side of the campus to read the inscription on the ag building, Hilgard Hall.  His name was Paul Taylor, and he’d devoted his life and his career to defending both the family farm and the rights of farm laborers, protecting the acreage limitation and residency provisions of federal reclamation law until they were decimated by enlightenment thinking and politics in 1992.  
           
     The inscription reads “To rescue for human society the native values of rural life,” a sentiment which bridges the leaking divide between two ways of knowing.  It is academic acknowledgement of the value of those who might not be seen as ‘enlightened.”  It is an intention, a statement of purpose and responsibility, not just a declaration of virtue.  
           
     It also expresses understanding of a potential danger – that human society might become torn from its sustaining roots – as well as indicating the tonic needed.  Forty years after reading the inscription, I still think it shows the way to become continent again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trudy Wischemann is an agrarian advocate who is editing a book of writings on Agriculture and the Common Good with Tulare Lake Basin geographer Bill Preston.  Thanks to Jim Likins and Ronald Abee for their comments this week.  You can send your stories of rural life c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment