Published Sept. 9, 2015 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette
The other night I was scanning my bookshelves for pieces I might have left out of my collection of writings on Agriculture and the Common Good. When my eyes lit on it, my fingers reached for Marc Reisner’s Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water, a book so dense with the common bad of water politics it could take a month of reading to find a few pages to excerpt.
Published in 1986, the book was
described as “a savagely witty history of America’s reckless depletion of its
water resources,” in Newsday. The Washington
Post Book Review called it “a highly partisan, wonderfully researched
portrayal of the damming, diverting and dirtying of western rivers.” Publishers
Weekly said “This timely and important book should be required reading for
all citizens.”
Although I think Publishers Weekly
was right, I doubt the book was well read here in the Valley. Almost 30 years later many of our citizens
are still making the same kind of arguments for more dams that Reisner showed
were reasonless and irrational, in massive denial of the facts of water’s
availability and the costs to develop it.
The reason for making those arguments still exist - that dams can make a
few people temporarily rich - but 30 years later those people are even smaller
in number. Unfortunately, they may be
more powerful.
I grew up in the 1950’s, when big
water projects like the CVP here and Bonneville in the Pacific Northwest were
viewed as heroic and totally positive undertakings designed to create and
spread wealth among the western citizenry.
I remember watching newsreels in school about their physical
construction and economic contributions, and I believed every word of it. I chose Grand Coulee Dam as the subject of
the first report I wrote in grade school.
A decade earlier that same spirit had captured Woody Guthrie, who worked
for the feds for a month putting this heroism and hope into song.
But by the 1980’s the promises
showed their true colors and the costs had begun to show up. In Reisner’s introduction, “A semidesert with
a Desert Heart,” we can see why:
“One does not really conquer a place
like (California.) One inhabits it like
an occupying army and makes, at best, an uneasy truce with it.... The only way
to make the region over is to irrigate it.
But there is too little water to begin with, and water in rivers is
phenomenally expensive to move... The point is that despite heroic efforts and
many billions of dollars, all we have managed to do in the arid West is turn a
Missouri-sized section green - and that conversion has been wrought mainly with
nonrenewable groundwater. But a goal of
many westerners and of their federal archangels . . . has long been to double,
triple, quadruple the amount of desert that has been civilized and farmed, and
now these same people say that the future of a hungry world depends on it, even
if it means importing water from as far away as Alaska.
“What they seem not to understand,”
he continues, “is how difficult it will be just to hang on to the beachhead
they have made. Such a surfeit of
ambition stems, of course, from the remarkable record of success we have had in
reclaiming the American desert. But the
same could have been said about any number of desert civilizations throughout
history - Assyria, Carthage, Mesopotamia; the Inca, the Aztec, the Hohokam -
before they collapsed.”
How to live here in this place,
within the limits nature provides and God or someone has allowed us to stretch
well beyond, is a question this drought has provided for us to ponder. If we respond rightly, I think we may be
finding ourselves downsizing and going backward to something once more common
than the Cadillac.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trudy
Wischemann is an old car lover who writes.
You can send her your more politically correct water conservation ideas
c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or visit
www.trudysnotesfromhome.blogspot.com and leave a comment there.
I remember how important Reisner's book was in the development of my thinking.
ReplyDeleteMe, too. It blew me away, Pollyanna daughter that I was. Thanks for letting me know.
Delete