Separation Anxiety

Published in somewhat edited form June 20, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     I have just watched online a CNN  interview with John Moore, the Getty photographer who took the photograph that went viral over the weekend of a wailing two-year-old on the ground near the border.  She's a little Honduran girl in hot pink shirt and shoes, black pants; her mother had just put her down,  obeying the orders of a border patrol guard who was about to begin a body search.

           

     Moore said the mother, who’d just spent a month crossing Mexico, did not know what was coming.  She did not know what was going to happen to her, much less that her daughter, who she’d carried the whole trip, would be taken from her person.  She had no idea that her daughter would be taken to some unknown place where she would not be able to protect her child, much less know if she was safe.  But the photographer knew, and the separation anxiety he witnessed in the little girl set off separation anxiety in him and magnified it 100 times.

           

     Although the tears he captured on film were a normal two-year-old’s reaction to uncertainty, I think they represent what we all are feeling after learning what we’re doing at the border.  “The families there had no idea they were about to be separated from their children,” he said.  “I could tell they weren’t up on the recent news, they’ve been traveling in difficult conditions.  But I knew what was going to happen next.  And for me to take these pictures, scenes that I’d seen before but with the knowledge that these parents and their children would soon be in separate detention facilities – made it hard for me personally as a journalist, as a human being, and especially as a father.”  Then he added, just as the interview ended, “on Father’s Day.”

           

     That tail-end comment brought me close to understanding something my father always said about never losing your concern for your children.  John Moore, the photographer, is silver-haired; his children are likely out of the nest at least and safely on their own journey.  But for many people, the desire to protect and provide never leaves.  Those feelings of responsibility are extended when the events of childhood and child-raising leave scars on one or both sides of the equation.

     Many professionals, like Dr. Colleen Kraft, president of the American Association of Pediatrics, have expressed concern for the long-term impacts on the children from this separation from their parents.  But I have tremendous fear also for the parents, and not only what they’re feeling now, but will feel about themselves in the future.  Some of these families will get through this, roughed up but intact.  Some of them won’t.

           

     Do any of you remember the film “Sophie’s Choice?”  In it, the Nazis forced Meryl Streep’s character to decide which child to keep with her, her son or her daughter, with the unchosen child to be taken away by the tyrants.  The scene has never left my body; I can still see her standing in line, paralyzed, traumatized.  My mind has blocked out which child she chose, but not her only recourse for  having made the decision, which was suicide.  The “choice” forced upon her was deliberately inhuman.   I think what we're doing to these families is, too. 

           

     This administration’s action is not a question of enforcing the laws.  It’s trying to force the country’s already-divided politicians into a frenetic free-for-all, while Donald Trump stands aside, watching gleefully at the mayhem he’s created.  The immigrant families are merely hostages of yet another malevolent scheme to make DT look effective.  But now we’re hostages, too, those of us brought to tears by the stories of family separations.  I think what we’re grieving is the breaking of the parent-child bond.  Let us use our empathetic grief to change this policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is a writer who lives in Lindsay.  You can send your thoughts to her at P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.  Be sure to read "When ICE Comes" as well  from two weeks ago.

 

The Missing Trees

Published June 13, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     “Take Me Out to the Ball Game,” was running through my head as I sat down to write this column.  I think it was being broadcast telepathically from the Lindsay Olive Bowl, our historic sports complex that hosted adult baseball teams in the past as well as youths’, and high school football games as well.  The olive-shaped scoreboard, donated by Lindsay High School Students and Lindsay Ripe Olive Company, still has places to record the downs and quarters as well as the runs and innings.  Going there, even when it is empty of people, provides an experience of continuity, being part of Lindsay’s past better days as well as the better ones we hope will come.

           

     But if you’ve been following the plans for Lindsay with even a half-open eye, you’ll know they’re not coming soon.  We have at least two strikes against us, if not three:  the half-baked plans put forward by staff and the lack of critical questioning and oversight of those plans by the council.  The third strike is we, the people, who do not believe we can influence this process and just stay out of it.

           

     I think the reason the Olive Bowl was singing to me is the memory of the missing trees at the Lindsay Public Golf Course, which was closed in February to prepare for its renovation into soccer fields.  The grant money that had been secured to renovate the Olive Bowl was moved from that purpose to the purpose of demolishing the golf course in order to build five new soccer fields (at the proposal of staff, the approval of Council, and the excitement of the youth soccer teams who stood to benefit from these new fields.)  The coaches of the baseball teams got the word a little late, and so were not able to muster their youthful players to be at the council meeting where this approval occurred.

           

     The reason given for this money-shifting was that the Olive Bowl’s renovation plans had been stymied by the death of the engineer in charge, and with the non-extendable deadline of June 30 for the expenditure of these funds, the money would be rescued from potential loss by diverting them to this more easily completed project.

           

     Since February I have been watching the golf course with an anxious eye, hoping for a reprieve.  Even as the grass grew long this spring, golfers were going out and hitting balls in the rough, so to speak.  The leaves on the trees returned, and the landscape moved from being a well-trimmed park to a sortof nature preserve, still lovely, green-treed open space.

           

     Then the grass turned yellow, and sometime in late May while I was travelling, they cut the trees.  They didn’t cut them down, mind you:  they just beheaded them, cut off all their limbs, and left 10’ tall stumps standing bare-naked in the sun.  It looks brutal to me.

           

     And now there are less than three weeks to go before that money has to be spent to make soccer fields for all those excited youth.  When the kids thought of having soccer fields there, did they imagine the trees remaining to provide shade for the parents on the sidelines?  Did the coaches realize the city intended to turn a simple paradise into yet another shadeless desert in summer?  Did any of us?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is a pained tree-hugger who lives in Lindsay.  You can send her your thoughts c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

           

When ICE Comes

Published June 6, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     There is a beautiful, tall row of corn growing in the back yard of the house next door to mine where once there was a dense hedge of pyracantha, commonly known as the Firethorn bush.  Although the cedar waxwings undoubtedly miss the red berries in winter on both sides of their north-south migration, my neighbors will be eating from their little piece of land this year, something I admire.

           

     Changes in vegetation are only one of the differences in my neighborhood since I first moved here.  Once there were workers and managers at Lindsay Olive, an ag chemist, the owner of the Chevron station, and a farm labor contractor whose crews served the nearby Sunkist packinghouse.  Now I don’t know where anyone works or where they’re from, a reflection of my reclusive nature and their commute schedules.  Our language differences add a small complication to the non-local nature of our lives.

           

     I imagine that’s not too different from many neighborhoods in our small towns now.  I don’t know the citizenship status of my neighbors, and I certainly wouldn’t ask, out of politeness.  They’re my neighbors, and I keep looking for ways to act accordingly despite my ignorance of their lives.  But since the March 13^th  meeting of the Lindsay City Council, when the Council was approached by activated citizens seeking official support for DACA students (which the Council gave,) I have been wondering what I would do if ICE showed up at my neighbors’ doors.

           

     In Germany during WWII, when their government’s agents known as Brown Shirts came to take away Jewish neighbors, the non-Jewish neighbors had two responses.  One was to hide behind the curtains and watch, assuming the government knew what it was doing or remaining silent, simply too afraid to make a peep.  The other, much riskier, was to take their Jewish neighbors into their homes and hide them.  With 20/20 hindsight, we have become judgmental about the curtain-watchers, but are blind to the fact that here in good old America there are no stories about families taking in their Japanese neighbors when they were being rounded up by our government officials and taken away to internment camps.

           

     Mark Smith, pastor of both the Exeter and Lindsay Methodist Churches, was at the March 13^th Lindsay City Council meeting, where we met organizers from CHIRLA, the Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights (Los Angeles.)  CHIRLA has a new office in Porterville, and the organizers were eager to find ways of serving the community. 

           

     Wanting to know what we can do to help, we met with them and decided to sponsor one of their workshops on immigrants’ rights.  This workshop will be held at Lindsay United Methodist Church’s Maxwell Hall on Sunday, June 10^th at 5:30 p.m.  It will be conducted primarily in Spanish to serve those residents, documented and undocumented, who could benefit from knowing what to do if and when ICE comes to their door.  We hope to begin the process of learning what the rest of us might do as well.  Please join us if you can, and watch this column for further developments.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is co-editor of the forthcoming volume A Little Piece of Land:  Writings on Agriculture and the Common Good in California.  You can send her your thoughts on ICE incursions c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

           

Westlands' Fake Tears

Published in slightly edited form May 30, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     When I travel north, I normally take Highway 99.  It keeps me in touch with our neighbors: the smaller communities like ours based in nuts, tree fruit, vines and field crops rather than the Mediterranean orchards of citrus and olives.  Of course, it also exposes me to the latest developments around our cities, sometimes a rude awakening.

           

     But lately I’ve had reasons to swing over to I-5 instead, which I used to avoid for its barrenness and lack of human settlement.  It took me a little time to realize that the stretch of I-5 from Highway 198 north to Highway 152, which (heading west) circumnavigates San Luis Reservoir through Pacheco Pass and drops us into the verdant Santa Clara Valley -- that entire stretch of I-5 traverses the only a portion of the Westlands Water District's west side.

           

     I was surprised by the amount of green along that route.  Vast plantings of almond trees line the road where tumbleweeds used to grow until they became uprooted and bounced along the highway.  In small triangles of unused or unusable land, the previous landscape was evident, with a few groves of dead tree stumps remaining from the drought.  In those unirrigated triangles were signs that read “Congress Created Dust Bowl.”

           

    I almost expected to see skulls of dead cattle and abandoned Model A’s nearby, but the signs were really a form of rural street theater. Something for the news photographers to focus on, after interviewing a solemn farmer who’d just bulldozed his old, beloved almond grove.  But the sense of increased greenery made me wonder how many trees were really lost.  I decided to investigate. 

     By going to the Westlands Water District website, it is possible to examine the crop reports for every year since 2000.  In those years, the number of acres planted in almonds has tripled, from 29,178 to 87,882.  There was only one year with slightly fewer acres of almonds harvested than the year before (2017 saw 30 less acres harvested than 2016.)  Acres of harvested pistachios saw an even greater per cent increase, from 5,131 acres in 2000 to 44,103 acres in 2017.  Other permanent plantings almost tripled in that same time period, from 21,381 acres to 60,211.  More than half of that 60,211 acres are trees and vines that in 2017 had not yet come into production.

           

     What this means for us, the taxpayers, is that we will be begged 2.6 times more and harder to send taxpayer-supported, taxpayer-developed water in short supply to a district intended to receive supplemental water supplies only.  With their political power Westlands will continue to get from Congress the concessions they need to keep water flowing their way, with or without new dam construction.  Their few, large landowners will export those easy-shipping nuts to China or wherever, and reap what we’ve sown with water needed elsewhere.

           

     Methinks we need some signs along I-5 that read “Congress Created Boondoggle” on those miles of green almond orchards.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is an old-timey researcher who still uses paper and pen to line up her columns of numbers.  You can send her your I-5 sightings c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

On Travel

Published May 23, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette

     I took a trip over Mother’s Day weekend, crossing 8 county lines before I reached my destination.  No one stopped me, asked my name or required identification, nor should they have.  I am an American citizen, and my right to travel is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.  Had I crossed 8 state lines, the result would have been the same.

           

     It was a great trip, wonderful to see family and different scenery, but it was just as great to get back.  I hate to leave home.  As an American citizen, I am lucky because I also have the right not to travel.  I have property rights and citizenship that allows me to stay put, to vote for my representatives in government and to participate in some of its affairs, i.e., to claim this place for myself as home.

           

     Those two rights - to stay and to go - are not accorded to vast numbers of people around the globe.  But there are people in this country who do not have those rights either:  the homeless and the undocumented.

           

     The exercise of both rights, to stay and to go, costs money.  The homeless, though they may be U.S. citizens, by and large do not have enough money to stay under a roof.  The lack of a permanent address prevents their exercise of many other rights, including voting.  The undocumented, however, most of whom immigrated here to find work, may  have the money to keep sheltered and otherwise legal, but the threat of deportation (especially now) puts extreme limits on their ability to stay as well as to go.

            T

     These thoughts brought to mind some lyrics from a Ry Cooder song from the Dust Bowl, a time when huge numbers of American citizens were displaced, stripped from their homes, and forced to travel to find work or else starve. Despite being citizens, many were prevented from crossing state lines, or were so harassed by locals in the communities where they camped there was no option but to move on.  The lyrics go:  “How can you keep on moving unless you migrate too?  They tell you to keep on moving, but migrate you must not do.  The reason that I’m moving, the reason that I roam, is to get to a new location and find myself a home.”

           

     Then my mind flashed to another set of words from a book by John Berger, And Our Faces, My Heart, Brief as Photos (1984).  In it he provides a broader perspective on migration:

           

     “The transformation from a nomadic life to a settled one is said to mark the beginning of what was later called civilization.  Soon all those who survived outside the city began to be considered uncivilized... Perhaps during the last century and a half an equally important transformation has taken place.  Never before our time have so many people been uprooted.  Emigration, forced or chosen, across national frontiers or from village to metropolis, is the quintessential experience of our time.”

           

     London born, living in a French village, Berger’s European timeline is longer than our American one, but both Old and New Worlds have experienced and are made of these two transformations:  movers and stickers, settled and migrant.  Perhaps if we looked at the reasons for both, we lucky settled ones would find better ways to accommodate the travelers, especially those looking for a new home.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is a semi-nomadic writer who is grateful for the roof over her head.  You can send her your travel thoughts and stories c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a message below.

We Need to Talk

Published May 9, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     The phrase “We need to talk” can sound menacing when it comes from a boss or a mate, implying the need for some change the hearer may not want. And it might sound menacing to you when I say it regarding immigration issues.  These issues are so longstanding here in the Valley that we think our lives depend on them.  They’re part of the status quo, and that’s what I think we need to talk about.

           

     Monday morning’s Fresno Bee carried yet another front-page story about the trials of people facing deportation who were brought here as children through no fault of their own.  I’m going to call them “importees” from now on, for the sense of involuntariness is what moves us to care, and it should.

           

     This man, Vanna In, considered Cambodian but born in Viet Nam in the mid-1970’s when our war on that country was just ending, leaving rice paddies, roads, villages and towns in ruins, has become a minister to gang members, having been one himself.  He’s not just a productive member of society, he’s a healer of one of this society’s wounds.  But his early childhood education, so to speak, leaves him extremely vulnerable in this tragic political moment, when Congress is too hamstrung to act.  He faces deportation to Cambodia, where he has never lived.

           

     The article, written by Carmen George, who has been bringing us compelling pieces of beauty from our region for several years now, tells how we might help this singular man.  Rev. Vanna In has petitioned Gov. Jerry Brown for a pardon, which could lead to citizenship if granted.  A petition in support of that request is available at www.change.org, and has gathered over 7,000 signatures already.

           

     We need to do more, however, than help people one at a time.  President Trump’s machete-like action cutting off the DACA program, which provided a measure of stability to some of these importees, was a rash challenge to Congress, a wielding of the power of the pen to provoke legislative action toward resolving our unresolved immigration issues.  But Congress cannot resolve them while we, the people, are so unresolved ourselves.

           

     There are people in this country, powerful people, who benefit economically from the availability of undocumented (“illegal”) immigrants.  Their political influence will make it difficult to find a national legislative solution.  Meanwhile, the economic costs are borne by the immigrants themselves and by the communities in which they live.  Rev. Vanna In’s story, luckily, shows us the benefits we also receive at the community level.

           

     Perhaps this story and others will help us start the conversations we need to be having at the local level about immigration:  about who qualifies as “American” and how we gain that status, the pathways to citizenship.  About what we do, as neighbors and friends, when ICE comes to the door of the house down the street, supposedly to “fix” the problem of illegal immigration, but ripping apart families, churches, neighborhoods, and communities instead.

           

     We need to talk, and we need to talk now, before ICE comes.  Let’s find a way to do it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is the granddaughter of immigrants before there were laws to prevent them from entering.  You can send her your immigrant origins c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.

 

 

 

 

Cure & Correct

Published May 2, 2018 in Tulare County's Foothills Sun-Gazette


     Well, folks, it looks like we’re going to have a roundabout at Hermosa and Westwood, no matter what.  No matter that 800+ people signed a petition against it back in January, no matter that a study of what might be done at Lincoln School to reduce traffic congestion has not yet been completed.  No matter that anyone in town who hears about the proposal says “What? Not again!” 

           

     At the last city council meeting April 24^th, I filed a complaint called a “cure and correct” notice about the public hearing April 10^th when the project was approved.  The public hearing had not been identified as such on the council agenda, which was simply noted as a “site plan review.”  For those with long years of experience fighting development projects and surreptitious planning departments, that might have been a red flag.  But for members of the general public, the word “review” sounds like just another discussion.

           

     In my complaint I claimed there had not been proper public notice.  Technically I was mistaken.  I missed the notice published March 24^th in the Porterville Recorder, which I don’t subscribe to or read, and I missed the copy of that legal notice in the agenda packet as well.  The city met the minimum legal requirement of notice, but whether or not the spirit of the law has been met is another matter.

           

     At the April 10^th meeting we didn’t get a public hearing, we got a kangaroo court.  The city manager did not offer an apology or explanation of why the item hadn’t been identified as a public hearing on the agenda.  He simply jumped up from his chair, declared that it was a public hearing, took over the discussion of the site plan review from Brian Spaunhurst, the assistant city planner who was scheduled to present it, and then raced through the discussion like it was a done deal.  And when it was followed by no discussion from the council whatsoever, it clearly was.

           

     During the public hearing, where I was the only one present to speak either for or against the project, I pointed out that no other member of the public was there.  Not one of the people who signed the petition, not one of the property owners who will be impacted, not one of the parents of Lincoln School students who are concerned about how their children will be escorted safely through the crosswalks of a traffic device intended to keep cars and trucks from having to stop.  Not one.  When I called one of the organizers to find out why no one showed, she said no, she hadn’t seen the notice, either, but she hadn’t been able to attend more meetings, and figured they were going to do what they wanted anyway.  And of course, she was right.

           

     There’s a lack of integrity in the planning process in Lindsay.  If we had a planning commission like every other little town in this region, there would be more time for public input and education about what they’re trying to build here with public funds.  But without that forum, it’s even more important that the public planning process is done right, in the spirit as well as the letter of the law mandating that process.   Let us begin with a reconsideration of the Hermosa/Westwood roundabout.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trudy Wischemann is a former student of environmental planning who lives appalled in Lindsay.  You can send her your ideas for improvement c/o P.O. Box 1374, Lindsay CA 93247 or leave a comment below.